Problem 4.15 (ANMs)

  1. Consider the SCM

with uniformly distributed between and and uniformly distributed between and and independent of . The distribution admits an ANM from to . Draw the support of the joint distribution of and convince yourself that does not admit an ANM from to , that is, there is no function and independent noise variables and such that

with independent of .

Solution Clearly Also clearly

Recall convolution or

So we get

Multiplying the marginal by the conditional gives the joint density

so the support is the slanted band

a parallelogram with vertices .

Now read the band the other way. Conditioning on ,

For neither bound binds and the interval is : width , a pure translate of a fixed set, which is exactly what an ANM needs. But for the constraint truncates it to , of width , and symmetrically near .

Why this rules out an ANM (Definition 4.4, p. 67). An ANM from to means with . Independence gives, for bounded measurable and Borel , by Fubini,

so for -a.e.  the conditional law is the law of . Hence is a.e. constant in . But from the conditional above, for and for , and both sets have positive -mass. Contradiction: there is no ANM from to . (Theorem 4.5, p. 67–68, does not apply: it requires strictly positive, smooth densities.)

  1. Similarly as in part a), consider the SCM

with uniformly distributed between and and uniformly distributed between and and independent of . Again, draw the support of and convince yourself that there is no ANM from to .