<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
      <title>Erik&#039;s notes</title>
      <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes</link>
      <description>Last 10 notes on Erik&#039;s notes</description>
      <generator>Quartz -- quartz.jzhao.xyz</generator>
      <item>
    <title>Helpers: convolution and deconvolution</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/deconv_helpers</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/deconv_helpers</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Helpers: convolution and deconvolution. Helper 1 (convolution as a matrix, finite case). ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Notes: Elements of Causal Inference (Peters, Janzing, Schölkopf)</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/elements-of-causal-inference</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/elements-of-causal-inference</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Page 35 This seems a conceptually novel way of looking at equivalence of partial pooling in causal models. Might be exact equivalence though. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Problem 3.6</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p36</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p36</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Problem 3.6. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Problem 4.15 (ANMs)</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p415</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p415</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Problem 4.15 (ANMs) Consider the SCM \begin{aligned} X &amp;:= N_X \\ Y &amp;:= 2X + N_Y \end{aligned} with N_X uniformly distributed between 1 and 3 and N_Y uniformly distributed between -0.5 and 0.5 and independent of N_X. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Problem 4.16 (Maximum likelihood)</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p416</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p416</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Problem 4.16 (Maximum likelihood) Assume that we are given an i.i.d. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Problem 5.1 (Independence of mechanisms)</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p51</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/p51</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Problem 5.1 (Independence of mechanisms) Let P_X be the mixture of k sharp Gaussian peaks at positions s_1,\dots,s_k as shown in Figure 5.5, left. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Sample executed post</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/sample-qmd-post</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/Causal-Inference/sample-qmd-post</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Links back to test-note. The identity \E[X+Y] = \E[X] + \E[Y] holds even when X \not\indep Y. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Home</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Welcome. See test-note. Math: x \indep y. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item><item>
    <title>Test note</title>
    <link>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/test-note</link>
    <guid>https://jaanerikpihel.com/notes/test-note</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[ Backlink target. \E[X] \in \R. ]]></description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 12:24:52 GMT</pubDate>
  </item>
    </channel>
  </rss>